A decision support methodology for a disaster-caused business continuity management
作者:
Highlights:
• When securing critical supplies, companies take over public responsibility
• Decision tools for disaster-caused business continuity management are lacking
• Logistical decision support must be analytically precise but comprehensible
• Scenarios can help to explore critical consequences in the disaster environment
• Risk preference dependent robustness measurement of decision alternatives
摘要
Supply chain risk management typically deals with the systematic identification, analysis and mitigation of risks which affect the whole supply chain network of a company. Business continuity management (BCM) forms part of supply chain risk management and is an important competitive factor for companies by ensuring the smooth functioning of critical business processes in the case of failures. If business operations are severely disrupted, the companies' decision maker is confronted with a situation which is characterized by a high degree of uncertainty, complexity and time pressure. In such a context, decision support can be of significant value. This article presents a novel decision support methodology which leads to an improved and more robust BCM for severe disruptions caused by disasters. The methodology is part of the Reactive Disaster and supply chain Risk decision Support System (ReDRiSS) to deal with different levels of information availability and to provide decision makers with a robust decision recommendation regarding resource allocation problems. It combines scenario techniques, optimization models and approaches from decision theory to operate in an environment characterized by sparse or lacking information and dynamic changes over time. A simulation case study is presented where the methodology is applied within the BCM of a food retail company in Berlin that is affected by a pandemic disaster.
论文关键词:Business continuity management,Decision support system,Robust decision-making,Risk management,Disaster management
论文评审过程:Received 8 August 2018, Revised 25 November 2018, Accepted 19 December 2018, Available online 21 December 2018, Version of Record 28 December 2018.
论文官网地址:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.12.006