Proper and improper uses of MCDA methods in energy systems analysis
作者：
Highlights：
• Our question: Was the chosen MCDA method the best fit for a case study?
• We used a new DSS to answer this question using energy systems analysis literature.
• We found a large share (about 60%) of improper uses of MCDA methods.
• This new DSS avoids the suboptimal selection of MCDA methods.
• Scholars and practitioners can now contribute to the next versions of our DSS.
摘要
•Our question: Was the chosen MCDA method the best fit for a case study?•We used a new DSS to answer this question using energy systems analysis literature.•We found a large share (about 60%) of improper uses of MCDA methods.•This new DSS avoids the suboptimal selection of MCDA methods.•Scholars and practitioners can now contribute to the next versions of our DSS.
论文关键词：Energy systems analysis,Decision making,Multiple criteria decision analysis,Decision support system,Method recommendation,MCDA,Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis,DMP,Decision-Making Problem,DSS,Decision Support System
论文评审过程：Received 1 January 2022, Revised 10 August 2022, Accepted 10 August 2022, Available online 27 August 2022, Version of Record 13 October 2022.
论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2022.113848
