Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration
作者：
Highlights：
• Text learning was found to be less effective on screen than on paper.
• Screen learning was consistently accompanied by overconfidence.
• Practice and in-depth processing successfully eliminated screen inferiority.
• Medium preference was associated with utilization of these methods.
• Generally, in-depth processing was associated with attenuated overconfidence.
摘要
•Text learning was found to be less effective on screen than on paper.•Screen learning was consistently accompanied by overconfidence.•Practice and in-depth processing successfully eliminated screen inferiority.•Medium preference was associated with utilization of these methods.•Generally, in-depth processing was associated with attenuated overconfidence.
论文关键词：Reading comprehension,E-learning,Human–computer interaction,Metacognitive monitoring,Metacomprehension,Overconfidence
论文评审过程：Available online 5 April 2014.
论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.046
