Assessing individual contributions to Collaborative Problem Solving: A network analysis approach
作者：
Highlights：
• Coding and counting models CPS processes of individuals as isolated and independent.
• ENA models CPS processes of individuals in relation to the processes of others.
• ENA found statistically significant differences between individuals in team settings.
• ENA found significant differences where coding and counting did not.
• Significant ENA differences were aligned with qualitative results.
摘要
•Coding and counting models CPS processes of individuals as isolated and independent.•ENA models CPS processes of individuals in relation to the processes of others.•ENA found statistically significant differences between individuals in team settings.•ENA found significant differences where coding and counting did not.•Significant ENA differences were aligned with qualitative results.
论文关键词：Collaborative Problem Solving,Epistemic Network Analysis,Coding and counting,Assessment,Measurement
论文评审过程：Received 29 May 2018, Revised 29 October 2018, Accepted 13 January 2019, Available online 16 January 2019, Version of Record 24 February 2020.
论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.009
