Integration and comparison of multi-criteria decision making methods in safe route planner

作者：

Highlights：

• Proposed the addition of decision analysis methods to the Safe Route Planner.

• Results of AHP, Fuzzy AHP, TOPSIS, Fuzzy TOPSIS and PROMETHEE were compared.

• The results show the better performance of AHP, Fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE.

• The results of TOPSIS and Fuzzy TOPSIS are inconsistent with other methods.

• Discounted Cumulative Gain is proposed to quantify the comparison results.

摘要

•Proposed the addition of decision analysis methods to the Safe Route Planner.•Results of AHP, Fuzzy AHP, TOPSIS, Fuzzy TOPSIS and PROMETHEE were compared.•The results show the better performance of AHP, Fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE.•The results of TOPSIS and Fuzzy TOPSIS are inconsistent with other methods.•Discounted Cumulative Gain is proposed to quantify the comparison results.

论文关键词：Safe route planner,AHP,TOPSIS,PROMETHEE,Fuzzy,Discounted cumulative gain

论文评审过程：Received 21 September 2019, Revised 18 March 2020, Accepted 20 March 2020, Available online 21 March 2020, Version of Record 30 April 2020.

论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113399