The development of an AI journal ranking based on the revealed preference approach
作者:
Highlights:
•
摘要
This study presents a ranking of 182 academic journals in the field of artificial intelligence. For this, the revealed preference approach, also referred to as a citation impact method, was utilized to collect data from Google Scholar. This list was developed based on three relatively novel indices: h-index, g-index, and hc-index. These indices correlated almost perfectly with one another (ranging from 0.97 to 0.99), and they correlated strongly with Thomson's Journal Impact Factors (ranging from 0.64 to 0.69). It was concluded that journal longevity (years in print) is an important but not the only factor affecting an outlet's ranking position. Inclusion in Thomson's Journal Citation Reports is a must for a journal to be identified as a leading A+ or A level outlet. However, coverage by Thomson does not guarantee a high citation impact of an outlet. The presented list may be utilized by scholars who want to demonstrate their research output, various academic committees, librarians and administrators who are not familiar with the AI research domain.
论文关键词:Artificial intelligence,Journal ranking,Academic journal,Google scholar,Citation impact,h-Index,g-Index,hc-Index
论文评审过程:Received 14 February 2010, Revised 14 April 2010, Accepted 15 April 2010, Available online 11 May 2010.
论文官网地址:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.04.001