Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time
作者：
Highlights：
• We run models using citation windows of one to ten years with both annual citation and cumulative citations as dependent variables.
• Independent variables were both bibliometric and quality indicators (judgments of peers).
• We find that the Journal Impact Factor has a larger effect on the citation impact than the quality.
• The number of pages and the quality of the references are less influential.
• The results call into question a discrepancy between the algorithmically based indicators and the qualitative judgments.
摘要
•We run models using citation windows of one to ten years with both annual citation and cumulative citations as dependent variables.•Independent variables were both bibliometric and quality indicators (judgments of peers).•We find that the Journal Impact Factor has a larger effect on the citation impact than the quality.•The number of pages and the quality of the references are less influential.•The results call into question a discrepancy between the algorithmically based indicators and the qualitative judgments.
论文关键词：Citation impact,F1000,Web of Science,Prediction
论文评审过程：Received 12 December 2014, Revised 10 March 2015, Accepted 10 March 2015, Available online 1 April 2015.
论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.03.001
