1751-1577

Journal of Informetrics （JOI） - Volume 9, Issue 4 论文列表

点击这里查看 Journal of Informetrics 的JCR分区、影响因子等信息
卷期号： Volume 9, Issue 4
发布时间： October 2015
卷期年份： 2015
卷期官网： https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-informetrics/vol/9/issue/4
本期论文列表
Inside Front Cover: Editorial Board

A methodology to compute the territorial productivity of scientists: The case of Italy

SemPathFinder: Semantic path analysis for discovering publicly unknown knowledge

Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: A quantitative approach based on barycenters

Unravelling the performance of individual scholars: Use of Canonical Biplot analysis to explore the performance of scientists by academic rank and scientific field

Attention decay in science

The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy

On a formula for the h-index

Author ranking based on personalized PageRank

Quality versus quantity in scientific impact

How to become an important player in scientific collaboration networks?

Early career grants, performance, and careers: A study on predictive validity of grant decisions

Further axiomatizations of Egghe's g-index

National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers

Assessing the impact of software on science: A bootstrapped learning of software entities in full-text papers

Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method

More precise methods for national research citation impact comparisons

Interpolated sub-impact factor (SIF) sequences for journal rankings

Ranking research institutions by the number of highly-cited articles per scientist

Exploring author name disambiguation on PubMed-scale

Measuring and comparing the R&D performance of government research institutes: A bottom-up data envelopment analysis approach

Funnel plots for visualizing uncertainty in the research performance of institutions

Quantifying the cognitive extent of science

Multiplicative versus fractional counting methods for co-authored publications. The case of the 500 universities in the Leiden Ranking

On the stability of citation-based journal rankings

Gender differences in scientific performance: A bibliometric matching analysis of Danish health sciences Graduates

Towards an early-stage identification of emerging topics in science—The usability of bibliometric characteristics

Are top-cited papers more interdisciplinary?