National, disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact: Evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator

作者：

Highlights：

• The geometric Mean Normalized Citation Score is introduced to compare sets of articles from different fields and years.

• Domestic journal articles with more authors tend to have more citations, but with disciplinary, national and temporal differences and the exception of Russia.

• Journal articles with more authors tend to have more citations, with disciplinary and temporal differences and the exception of Russia.

摘要

•The geometric Mean Normalized Citation Score is introduced to compare sets of articles from different fields and years.•Domestic journal articles with more authors tend to have more citations, but with disciplinary, national and temporal differences and the exception of Russia.•Journal articles with more authors tend to have more citations, with disciplinary and temporal differences and the exception of Russia.

论文关键词：Scientific co-authorship,gMNCS, MNCS,Geometric Mean Normalized Citation Score,Geometric new crown indicator,Research collaboration

论文评审过程：Received 9 October 2015, Revised 20 November 2015, Accepted 22 November 2015, Available online 18 December 2015, Version of Record 18 December 2015.

论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.007