A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators

作者:

Highlights:

摘要

The arguments presented demonstrate that the Mean Normalized Citation Score (MNCS) and other size-independent indicators based on the ratio to publications are not indicators of research performance. The article provides examples of the distortions when rankings by MNCS are compared to those based on indicators of productivity. The authors propose recommendations for the scientometric community to switch to ranking by research efficiency, instead of MNCS and other size-independent indicators.

论文关键词:Research evaluation,Productivity,Bibliometrics,FSS,University rankings

论文评审过程:Available online 25 April 2016, Version of Record 30 May 2016.

论文官网地址:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.006