Quantifying perceived impact of scientific publications
作者：
Highlights：
• Researchers tend to prefer their own publications to those by others. This bias is so strong that they prefer their own publications even to the most cited papers in their own field of research.
• When assessing papers written by others, researchers perceive the impact of these papers in way that is not strongly correlated with citation impact.
• Citation impact and perceived impact are significantly correlated only when researchers are asked to judge their own work.
摘要
•Researchers tend to prefer their own publications to those by others. This bias is so strong that they prefer their own publications even to the most cited papers in their own field of research.•When assessing papers written by others, researchers perceive the impact of these papers in way that is not strongly correlated with citation impact.•Citation impact and perceived impact are significantly correlated only when researchers are asked to judge their own work.
论文关键词：
论文评审过程：Received 7 March 2017, Revised 23 May 2017, Accepted 23 May 2017, Available online 14 June 2017, Version of Record 14 June 2017.
论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.010
