Post-publication expert recommendations in faculty opinions (F1000Prime): Recommended articles and citations
作者：
Highlights：
• Experts recommended published articles were cited more than other articles of the same biomedical journals except for cell.
• Although correlations between recommendation level and citedness were observed, a linear relationship was not found between the two measurements.
• The recommended articles were mostly classified as new finding, interesting hypothesis, and technical advance.
• Experts’ star ratings correlate with their sentiment comments for top recommended articles.
• Experts used hedged sentences to praise or criticize the articles in their comments.
摘要
•Experts recommended published articles were cited more than other articles of the same biomedical journals except for cell.•Although correlations between recommendation level and citedness were observed, a linear relationship was not found between the two measurements.•The recommended articles were mostly classified as new finding, interesting hypothesis, and technical advance.•Experts’ star ratings correlate with their sentiment comments for top recommended articles.•Experts used hedged sentences to praise or criticize the articles in their comments.
论文关键词：Post-publication expert recommendations,Cognitive authorities,Citation analysis,Sentiment analysis,F1000Prime,Faculty Opinions
论文评审过程：Received 17 September 2020, Revised 20 April 2021, Accepted 5 May 2021, Available online 1 June 2021, Version of Record 1 June 2021.
论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101174
