What should be rewarded? Gender and evaluation criteria for tenure and promotion

作者：

Highlights：

• Both interest-based and cognitive factors account for the preference of bibliometrics as evaluation criteria.

• Individual research quality influences positively the preference for bibliometrics.

• Differences in probabilities across genders are significant but small.

• At the top quality level, there are no differences between males and females in the probabilities of preferring bibliometric criteria

摘要

•Both interest-based and cognitive factors account for the preference of bibliometrics as evaluation criteria.•Individual research quality influences positively the preference for bibliometrics.•Differences in probabilities across genders are significant but small.•At the top quality level, there are no differences between males and females in the probabilities of preferring bibliometric criteria

论文关键词：Bibliometric assessment,Research evaluation,Merit criteria,Tenure and promotion,Value Judgment,Gender disparities,Academic values and beliefs,Preferences,Bibliometric evaluation criteria

论文评审过程：Received 13 September 2020, Revised 4 June 2021, Accepted 8 July 2021, Available online 26 July 2021, Version of Record 26 July 2021.

论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101196