An examination of the WHOQOL-BREF using four popular data collection methods

作者：

Highlights：

• Reliability coefficients of the WHOQOL-BREF was compared across data collection methodologies.

• Face-to-face participants yielded the least consistent results.

• Participants from Mechanical Turk, Craigslist, and Mechanical Turk yielded similar patterns of responses.

• Mechanical Turk appeared to be the best combination of effectiveness and efficiency.

摘要

•Reliability coefficients of the WHOQOL-BREF was compared across data collection methodologies.•Face-to-face participants yielded the least consistent results.•Participants from Mechanical Turk, Craigslist, and Mechanical Turk yielded similar patterns of responses.•Mechanical Turk appeared to be the best combination of effectiveness and efficiency.

论文关键词：Mechanical Turk,Craigslist,Online data collection,Psychometrics,WHOQOL-BREF

论文评审过程：Received 20 April 2015, Revised 7 September 2015, Accepted 21 September 2015, Available online 5 November 2015, Version of Record 5 November 2015.

论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.030